Trust

Corrections Policy

If a page has a wrong setting, unclear safety note or outdated assumption, it should be corrected and the page updated.

Best forChecking how the site is run and updated.
Main cautionCooking results are guidance, not guarantees.
Reviewed23 July 2026
Owner and editorSyed Saud Ahsan
Review statusCalculation rules, safety wording and source links are checked for consistency. Real-world test batches are labelled separately when available.
About the editor

Corrections policy

Cooking guidance can be wrong if the data, safety wording or assumptions are weak. The corrections process should make important fixes visible and update the underlying data, not just the page text.

  • Use the calculator as guidance.
  • Check food early.
  • Contact us with corrections or useful food examples.

How corrections should be handled

A reported issue should be checked against the food data, page copy, calculator logic and source notes before being closed.

  • High-risk safety issues should be prioritised before style or wording changes.
  • Food data fixes should update charts and calculators together.
  • Meaningful corrections should update the reviewed date.

Examples of important corrections

The most serious issues are the ones that could lead users to undercook food or misunderstand the evidence behind a result.

  • Incorrect safety temperature or missing leftover warning.
  • A calculated row incorrectly labelled as tested.
  • A broken source link or outdated energy-rate assumption presented as current.

Correction record

Important safety or data corrections update the affected page copy, calculator data and reviewed date together.

Sources and method